|
Return
to Empowerment & Participation
Return to Home Page
 |
Organization
Development |
Intervention Theory |
|
An Intervention Theory
The following is largely based on the work of Chris Argyris in Intervention
Theory and Method. It can be seen as the underlying "process
outcomes" the consultant is seeking in an intervention, i.e., valid
and useful information, free choice, and internal commitment. |
| Valid
and Useful Information |
- Information that can be publicly verified; that
can be tested with a broad range of people; that can be openly
gathered and discussed.
- Is useful in the sense that something can be done
with it to effect change
|
|
Free Choice
|
- The task is for the client to select the option
with the highest probability of succeeding (within cost
limits).
- The process needs to enable that choice to be:
- based on an exploration of options
- voluntary, not from habit or coercion
- proactive, not reactive
|
|
Internal
Commitment
|
- The target is for as many people as possible to
have a high level of commitment to the option that was
chosen.
- A high ownership and feeling of responsibility.
That people are acting under the influence of internal decision
rater than external forces.
- More likely to hold over time and under
stress
- Open to re-examination (our commitment to
"valid and useful information" may bring new information
and new choices)
|
| The theory assumes that one element builds on the
other. The more the information is valid and useful, the more likely the
free choice, the more there is truly free choice, the more likely there
will be internal commitment.
The theory also assumes that the consultant is not just trying to
help the client solve a particular problem or engage a specific
opportunity; but is also concerned with two other matters:
· that people end up with high internal commitment to the
direction, and
· that the organizational culture is enabled to increasingly
value and have the ability to generate valid and useful information,
encourage free choice, and seek internal commitment.
There is a tension in an intervention between addressing the
opportunity or problem at hand and pursuing the values in this
intervention theory. Organizational leaders may decide to give more
attention to one need over the other because of time limits, financial
costs or due to holding different values. |
Return
to Empowerment & Participation
Return to Home Page
|